Biosafety Protocol: Is There A Need For One? :: essays research papers fc

Biosafety Protocol Is There A Need For One?OutlineThesis statement An international biosafety protocol should be created toestablish and maintain control over the products knowing with ergonomics.I. The existing laws and regulations that govern the release oftransgenicorganisms are inadequate or nonexistent.A. The developed nations of the world are utilize regulationsthat were designed to control and monitor crops created with conventional technologies.B. Biotechnology is regulated by three different agencies.C. The undeveloped nations have virtually no regulationsgoverning transgenic organisms.1. This indicates that biotechnological interrogation can and isbeing conducted in these countries without regulation.2. There are many biotech companies based in developedcountries that have branches or joint ventures aroundthe world.II. The potential risks of transgenic organisms to the purlieuis still being determined.A. Some experts warn that there is a danger that biotechnologycan c reate mutant hybrids.B. Biotechnology has the potential to harm the economies of fewdeveloping nations.C. The last and possible the most important argument for aninternational biosafety protocol is in the name of ignoranceand cautionIII. The United States, Germany, Japan, and Australia are the onlycountries argue to the biosafety protocol.IV. The need for a change in the world of agriculture is undeniable.As the world moves closer to the 21st century, research and developmentin the area of biotechnology has increased dramatically. According to BetteHileman of Chemical and Engineering News, the world population will increase by3 billion people in the next cardinal years while the amount of land available foragriculture cannot be greatly expanded. "Biotechnology - specifically thataspect involved in transferring genes from one species into the DNA of other- has the potential to alleviate . . ." (8) this and many other problems facingthe world in the near future. Even thoug h biotechnology has already showndramatic results in the asylum of beneficial transgenic (geneticallyengineered) species, many countries and researchers are ". . . quite leery aboutthe uses of biotechnology" (8). Therefore, an international biosafety protocolshould be created to establish and maintain control over the products designedwith biotechnology.The existing laws and regulations that govern the release of transgenicorganisms are inadequate or nonexistent. In general, the developed nations ofthe world are using regulations that were designed to control and monitor cropscreated with traditional technologies like hybridization and cross-breeding(Hileman 8). Pamela Weintraub, of the National Audubon Society, states thatmany expected problems with biotechnology can be kept under control with properregulations, but the regulations (where there are any) governing biotechnologytoday are "tangled and obscure" (164).In the United States for example, biotechnology is r egulated by three