Distorting the Truth Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Distorting the Truth - Case Study Example According to the research findings, every country has its own set of laws for criminals but the international court of justice which has set some laws which are applicable to the entire world. Some of these cases are reported while others are never heard of. One specific type of crime happens to people belonging to different ethnicities and races. People belonging to a particular race will have distinct features and biological traits which the other group would not have. People tend to treat people of some races differently, for example, the way a person might treat an Asian might not be the same as the way they treat an American. The color of their skins is one through which people discriminate among people belonging to different races etc. Some physical differences are said to be inherited but discrimination is basically based on your social background or even your upbringing. People who discriminate on the basis of color, background or ethnicity are called racists and this can be seen as a crime. These people think that certain people belonging to a particular race are superior and the `lower race` does not deserve to even be at the same place as them. Some groups who have been the victims of these types of crime include Asians, Blacks, Hispanics and white people. Heather Mac Donald`s article â€Å"Distorting The Truth About Crime And Race† appeared in the City Journal and is based on an article which made the front page of the New York Times. Mac Donald believes that the NY times follow a specific procedure of portraying any story related to the New York Police Department (NYPD) on the basis of racial context: to relate the behavior of this police department to `racial crime rates`, rather than revealing the actual crime rates and then relating it.

Internet Governance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Internet Governance - Essay Example They have the technical expertise and have expanded as the situation changed. Control in too many hands is bound to lead to operational problems. A slight flaw could be disastrous to global communications, trade and commerce. The opponents, on the other hand want to curtail freedom through their repressive regimes. The developing countries have benefited immensely out of the internet and derive more benefit if control remains in the hands of the US. Arguments support that US is well-equipped and control of the internet should continue to remain in its hands. Internet became available to the public in 1994 and it took almost ten years for people of different nations to wake up wanting to get involved in the issues pertaining to regulations and governance. Internet today is an essential infra-structure for global communications, including trade and commerce. Internet governance as defined by the WGIG, is the development and application by Governments, the private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programs that shape the evolution and use of the Internet. This definition emphasizes that governance goes beyond the domain names system, which is handled by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). The support at this stage for governance of the internet is very vital. Earlier, internet was declared beyond the realm of the government for various reasons. So far, internet governance has been in the hands of US through ICANN but for the past few years voices have been raised against their control. While some support the US dominated structure, other nations seek international governance and feel that developing nations should have a significant role to play in this. This paper will highlight reasons why governance of the internet should remain with the US. Eric Krapf, editor of Business Communications Review expresses, countries